The garden door chez
Phillip and Patricia

Phillip, who is a business professor at the University of La
Rochelle, does not have classes on Monday and thus was free to spend most of the
day with us—after he took Sinclair to campus for his first class at 8:30, and attended a faculty meeting. While he
was gone, the rest of us enjoyed a leisurely continental breakfast. After that,
Michael and Nancy started their Monday-morning laundry while Patricia finished
putting together a tarte aux pommes
(apple tart) to be served at lunchtime.

At this point, we would like to make it clear that although
we offered to help Patricia prepare meals and clean up afterward, she would accept
no assistance, explaining that it was easier for her to work alone in her
culinary atelier than to direct people who didn’t know where anything was and weren’t
familiar with her methods. We understood completely—and we certainly didn’t
want to hinder her ability to continue producing such marvelous meals.

Between loads of laundry, we took time to work on our blog. Patricia
probably would have been offended by the fact that our attention was directed
toward our digital devices rather than toward other human beings, had she not
become intrigued by our modus operandi.
Having been raised by an aristocratic grandmother who presided over a very
traditional French household, Patricia has tried to cultivate the genteel ambiance
of an earlier era in her own home by eschewing some of the more vulgar
trappings of our modern age; to wit, she does not use an electric food
processor, a microwave oven, or a computer. Writing with anything other than pen
on paper is a foreign concept to her, as is assembling a photo album without
glue or adhesive corner mounts. So she was fascinated as she watched us work
back and forth among our devices, especially with the fact that words appeared
on Michael’s tablet as he typed, even though his Bluetooth keyboard isn’t physically
connected to it. Patricia was concerned that by focusing on our screens we were
isolating ourselves from real human contact, but her fears were allayed
somewhat when we explained that even though it seems that we are working
separately, we really have to coordinate our efforts: Michael usually writes
the first draft of each blog post, which Nancy then edits after incorporating a
lot of her own material. In the process of creating the narrative, we ask each
other a lot of questions to verify details and make sure we haven’t left out anything
significant. Michael usually decides where to insert the photos and tries to appropriately
format the surrounding text (although Blogger can be annoyingly uncooperative
with that task), and then Nancy checks to make sure the photos are in the right
places and the captions are accurate. Patricia finally seemed to understand that
the process requires a lot of interaction and cooperation, and when she
realized that we were creating the blog in order to share as many of our travel
experiences as we could with far-flung family and friends, she appreciated the
fact that our digital devices allow us to do that almost instantly—once the
writing and formatting are done.

Le table Harvard

While we continued alternating between writing and folding
laundry, Patricia prepared lunch. Our first course, served in cocktail glasses,
consisted of cubes of something she called—for lack of a better English term—“bread
meatloaf” (a sort of savory bread pudding), topped with a creamy cucumber-sorrel
sauce, and decorated with leftover shrimp. (Isn’t it amazing what delicious
concoctions a creative cook can devise with whatever happens to be at hand?)
The main course included delectable twice-cooked duck thighs and potato purées
in two different colors: one golden, the other purple, made from vitelotte potatoes. The vitelottes definitely had a musky, more
earthy taste than the golden ones.  We
finished with the requisite salad and cheeses, and an excellent tarte aux pommes. When we asked Patricia
whether she served multicourse lunches only when she had guests, or if she
prepared something so elaborate every day, she laughed off our term “elaborate”
and said, “At least three courses, twice a day, every day. That is our custom.”

Painting by Jacqueline Nesson
(otherwise known as “Mamina”)

Soon after lunch, we dropped off Patricia’s 92-year-old
mother at l’Houmeau’s equivalent of a senior center so she could attend her
painting club. (Mamina is an accomplished artist and equestrienne who specializes
in portraits of horses and dogs.) The two couples then drove about forty
kilometers across the marshes to the Château de la Roche Courbon. The original
castle, which had been built in the fifteenth century on a rocky promontory
rising from the wetlands, was transformed into an elegant residence during the
seventeenth century by Jean-Louis de Courbon. The marquis refused to flee during
the French Revolution and the family was allowed to
continue occupying the estate, but when upkeep became difficult the château
fell into disrepair and eventually was abandoned. In 1920, it was purchased by
Paul Chénereau, who restored the château and its gardens. This was more
complicated than one might initially imagine because the grounds had been completely
inundated by the River Bruant, which runs through the middle of the property.

Entering the Chateau de la Roche Courbon

In
order to restore the gardens to their former glory, Chénereau brought in an
engineer to design a gigantic raised bed in which grass, flowers, and
ornamental shrubs grow, while water continues to trickle underneath. The river constantly
replenishes a large reflecting pool as well as the fountain that flows from an
impressive staircase opposite the château. The property also includes some
prehistoric cave dwellings, which our children had enjoyed exploring when we
visited in 1993. Chénereau’s descendants retain one wing of the Château de la
Roche Courbon as a private residence, even though most of the estate is open to
the public. It has been a favorite place for Phillip and Patricia’s family to
visit through the years, and now has become particularly dear because it is
where Astrid and Geoffrey held their wedding celebration. (We were delighted to
discover a large photo of that grand event on display in the castle’s museum.)

Chateau de la Roche Courbon

The gardens at the chateau grow in what amounts to a giant raised bed to keep them above the marshy ground 

Phillip and Michael atop the stairway (the fountain wasn’t flowing today) 

View from the chateau”s ramparts
Michael and Nancy at the Chateau de la Roche Courbon

La Rochelle’s Harbor

On the way home, since Michael had a craving for some of the
gelato he had seen yesterday while we were strolling around La Rochelle, we
drove downtown again. Mais malheurs!—the
gelato emporium was closed. We settled for another round of chocolate viennoise and citron chaud, this time at the splendid Grande Époque-era Café de la Paix at the
Place de Verdun, near the Cathedrale Saint Louis de la Rochelle.

Cafe de la Paix

Later, while Patricia prepared dinner, Michael drove Phillip
back to the university to pick up Sinclair. 
Since they arrived a few minutes early, Phillip showed Michael his office
at the business school, which is across the street from Sinclair’s undergraduate
school.

Another “simple” meal—leek and potato soup, salmon omelet, salad,
and pastries—was ready when the men came home.
Although topics for previous
mealtime conversations have been all over the map, tonight we focused on
Sinclair and his studies. He is in his third and last year of an undergraduate law
program, and then will go on to a two-year graduate course leading to a law degree.
We were very interested in his description of recent changes in the French
university system, made at the behest of other universities in the E.U. to
bring about more commonality among their degree programs, and to foster educational
exchanges across the continent. He told us that all European universities now
use a sixteen-week semester schedule, similar to the standard U.S. model. Also
borrowing heavily from the American system, uniform values for “credits” have
been established; but whereas U.S. credits generally correspond to the number
of hours spent each week in the classroom, credits in the E.U. reflect study
time as well as classroom time. Study hours are arranged—and controlled—by the
university; so when Sinclair says he is taking a thirty-hour load, what he
means is that he is at school—either attending class or studying—thirty hours
each week. Credited time includes formal lectures, large-group “sections” or
labs, as well as small-group study sessions. Another major difference from the
American system is that rather than handing out a syllabus of required readings
and expecting students to study them on their own, professors provide all
necessary information during class time, taking questions and explaining as
they go along. Thus students here don’t really have what we think of as “homework,”
but they do have regular exams and other assessments so teachers can evaluate
their progress and make sure they understand the course material.

This dinnertime discussion interested us not only because of
the topic, but because it gave us the opportunity to hear Sinclair express
himself in English. Of Phillip’s three children, Sinclair is the most quiet and
reserved, and he has had the most difficult time mastering his father’s native
language (which the family has always tried to use at home). The last time we
had seen Sinclair, about four years ago during his first visit to the U.S., he
spoke very little—but listened and observed attentively. Even now, he is much slower
to enter the fray of dinner conversation than the rest of his family (much like
Nancy, who usually feels the need for so much mental editing before she says
anything that she often just stays silent while others let fly). Tonight,
however, without older siblings around to dominate the discussion, Sinclair
spoke fluently and with confidence in his second language, and we very much
enjoyed learning from him.